You are currently browsing the BlueGreenBlog archives for the dioxins category.

Archives

  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006


  • Categories

  • books (2)
  • building (1)
  • diet (4)
  • dioxins (3)
  • exploitation (3)
  • global warming (5)
  • health (2)
  • link (5)
  • media (2)
  • news (4)
  • pollution (6)
  • sustainability (5)
  • techonology (4)
  • toxins (5)
  • Uncategorized (2)
  • website (5)
  • zero waste (1)

  • Archive for the 'dioxins' Category

    Wednesday, December 27th, 2006

    Received an electronic gadget for Christmas? This sobering ABC story on electronic waste will make your toes curl:

    315 million to 600 million desktop and laptop computers in the U.S. will become obsolete over the next 18 months. That’s the equivalent of a 22-story pile of e-waste covering the entire city of Los Angeles.

    Read more: One Man’s Trash Doesn’t Necessarily Become Another Man’s Treasure


    Wednesday, December 27th, 2006

    Received an electronic gadget for Christmas? This sobering ABC story on electronic waste will make your toes curl:

    315 million to 600 million desktop and laptop computers in the U.S. will become obsolete over the next 18 months. That’s the equivalent of a 22-story pile of e-waste covering the entire city of Los Angeles.

    Read more: One Man’s Trash Doesn’t Necessarily Become Another Man’s Treasure


    Antibacterial soap component confirmed endocrine disruptor

    Wednesday, October 25th, 2006

    We’re speaking, of course, of the stuff called Triclosan. It’s present in most soaps and toothpastes and possibly other personal care products, even soaps that aren’t loudly proclaiming their antibacterial properties.

    Funny thing is, the marketing of antibacterial soap, dish soap, hand-sanitizers would have people believe that soap alone is no longer enough - and this is a convenient but definite lie, preying upon people’s fears of sickness and the desire to keep their families healthy. It also exploits the ignorance that most people have of how prevalent use of Triclosan will actually speed the ability of microbes to develop resistance.

    The main property of any kind of soap is to give water the power to pick up grease and dirt. The slipperiness of soapy water allows us to wash microbes off our hands and bodies and down the drain, where we can stop worrying about them. Killing microbes is only necessary if you’re a surgeon.

    (Ongoing research on allergies even hints it is healthy to be occasionally exposed to some relatively-harmless bacteria, training our body to react to those instead of developing more inconvenient allergic reactions to pollen, dust mites and dander.)

    More reasons to give “anti-bacterial” products a miss:

    Producing Triclosan on the large scale we do now not only takes resources but produces pollution that includes dioxin-like compounds being released into the environment - chlorinated Triclosan falls under this category. Dioxins are nasty business, and all living organisms suffer from exposure to these cancer-causing substances.

    In addition: You can now file Triclosan as an endocrine-disruptor (another one to add to the list we’re exposed to everyday in perfumes, cosmetics, pesticides, certain plastics and so on). Kind of important if you happen to be an animal whose body is regulated by hormones! Germ fighter works as endocrine disrupter

    WIKIpedia: Triclosan, Soap, Endocrine_disruptor, Dioxins

    Worldwatch Institute: Soap